Lecture Series

Spring 2021

lecture: “Modeling the Dynamics of Poverty”

Speaker: Rediet Abebe (University of California, Berkeley)
March 1, 2021

The dynamic nature of poverty presents a challenge in designing effective assistance policies. A significant gap in our understanding of poverty is related to the role of income shocks in triggering or perpetuating cycles of poverty. Such shocks can constitute unexpected expenses—such as a medical bill or a parking ticket—or an interruption to one’s income flow. Shocks have recently garnered increased public attention, in part due to prevalent evictions and food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, shocks do not play a corresponding central role in the design and evaluation of poverty-alleviation programs.

To bridge this gap, we present a model of economic welfare that incorporates dynamic experiences with shocks and pose a set of algorithmic questions related to subsidy allocations. We then computationally analyze the impact of shocks on poverty using a longitudinal, survey-based dataset. We reveal insights about the multi-faceted and dynamic nature of shocks and poverty. We discuss how these insights can inform the design of poverty-alleviation programs and highlight directions at this emerging interface of algorithms, economics, and social work.

Rediet Abebe is an Assistant Professor of Computer Science at the University of California, Berkeley and a Junior Fellow at the Harvard Society of Fellows. Abebe holds a Ph.D. in computer science from Cornell University and graduate degrees in mathematics from Harvard University and the University of Cambridge. Her research is in artificial intelligence and algorithms, with a focus on equity and justice concerns. Abebe is a co-founder and co-organizer of the multi-institutional, interdisciplinary research initiative Mechanism Design for Social Good (MD4SG). Her dissertation received the 2020 ACM SIGKDD Dissertation Award and an honorable mention for the ACM SIGEcom Dissertation Award for offering the foundations of this emerging research area. Abebe’s work has informed policy and practice at the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Ethiopian Ministry of Education. She has been honored in the MIT Technology Reviews’ 35 Innovators Under 35 list as a pioneer and the Bloomberg 50 list as a one to watch. Her work has been featured in BBC, ELLE, Forbes, and Shondaland and presented at venues including the National Academy of Sciences,United Nations, and Museum of Modern Art. Abebe also co-founded Black in AI, a non-profit organization tackling representation and equity issues in AI. Her research is influenced by her upbringing in her hometown of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Fall 2020

lecture: “Disability Technologies: Ethical Pitfalls and Social Responsibilities

Speaker: Dr. Ashely Shew (Virginia Tech)
October 5, 2020

People often talk about designing for disabled people as engineering in a humanitarian mode, and designers are lauded for their work to help people when it concerns disability technology. There is resistance to how this work is cast from the disability community. Our community often sees projects developed without rich engagement with the relevant communities and sees praised-projects that are commercial failures because designers don’t listen to disabled people or really understand the context they are working in. This talk works to elevate disability narrative –that is, the stories disabled people tell –about technologies to think ethically and more responsibly about design for disability. We should take disabled people as experts about disability technology, reorienting how we think about engagement, social responsibility, and ethical engineering practice.

Ashley Shew is an associate professor of Science, Technology, and Society (STS) at Virginia Tech. With a team of graduate and undergraduate students, she currently studies the stories disabled people tell about technology with the help of an NSF CAREER Award. She also works with a team from Engineering Education on the experiences of disabled civil engineering students and as part of an interdisciplinary graduate education program on regenerative medicine.She centers her work in philosophy of technology with strong interests in animal studies, disability studies, bioethics, and emerging technologies. Shew is author of Animal Constructions and Technological Knowledge(2017), co-editor of three philosophy of technology volumes, and serves as co-editor-in-chief of the academic journal Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology.

lecture: “Restrictions, Rationing and Responsibilities: The Three R’s of Pandemic Ethics

Speaker: Dr. Matthew Wynia (CU Anschutz)
September 21, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated numerous ethical challenges, from triage in the event of severe resource shortages, to ensuring the safety of essential workers, to saving lives while also preserving livelihoods. Dr. Matthew Wynia will explore some of the most contentious issues faced and the most painful lessons learned for policy makers, the public, and frontline healthcare professionals during these trying times.

Dr. Wynia’s training is in internal medicine, infectious diseases, public health and health services research. His career has included developing a research institute and training programs focusing on bioethics, professionalism and policy issues (the AMA Institute for Ethics) and founding the AMA’s Center for Patient Safety. His research has focused on novel uses of survey data to inform and improve the practical management of ethical issues in healthcare and public policy.He has led projects on a wide variety of topics related to ethics and professionalism, including understanding and measuring the ethical climate of healthcare organizations and systems; ethics and quality improvement; communication, team-based care and engaging patients as members of the team; defining physician professionalism; public health and disaster ethics; medicine and the Holocaust (with the US Holocaust Memorial Museum); and inequities in health and health care. He has served on committees, expert panels and as a reviewer for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, The Joint Commission, the Hastings Center, the American Board of Medical Specialties, federal agencies, and other organizations.Dr. Wynia is a past president of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH), and has chaired the Ethics Forum of the American Public Health Association (APHA) and the Ethics Committee of the Society for General Internal Medicine (SGIM). He is an elected Fellow of the Hastings Center and serves on the Fellows’ Council

Spring 2020

lecture: “CHINA GOES GREEN: COERCIVE ENVIRONMENTALISM FOR A TROUBLED PLANET

Speaker: Dr. Judith Shapiro (American University)
February 11, 2020

What does it mean for the future of the planet when one of the world’s most durable authoritarian governance systems pursues “ecological civilization”? China exemplifies a model of state-led environmentalism that concentrates decisive political, economic, and epistemic power under centralized leadership. Professor Shapiro, who has worked in China since the mid-1970s, will introduce the concrete mechanisms of China’s coercive environmentalism to show how “going green” helps the state to further other agendas such as citizen surveillance and geopolitical influence.

Dr. Judith Shapiro is on the faculty of the Global Environmental Politics program and directs the Dual Degree in Natural Resources and Sustainable Development (NRSD) with University for Peace in Costa Rica. Her new book, China Goes Green: Coercive Environmentalism for a Troubled Planet, with Yifei Li, was published in 2020 by Polity. She is also the author of China’s Environmental Challenges (Polity 2012, Second Edition 2016), Mao’s War against Nature (Cambridge 2001) and the co-author of Son of the Revolution (Knopf 1983) and other books on China. Her current research is on the political and social dynamics of environmental degradation, and on the prospects for sustainable development in China.

lecture: “DESIGNING SOCIALLY PERSUASIVE ROBOTS (ETHICALLY…)​

Speaker: Dr. Katie Winkle (Bristol University, UK)
January 14, 2020

In this talk I will be discussing:

(i) why social robots might need to be persuasive to be useful, and why persuasion is a useful model for social human robot interaction

(ii) the ethical risks arising from designing socially persuasive robots

(iii) practical methods for considering and addressing such concerns during the robot design/automation process

I’ll be drawing on examples from my work with robots for therapy and exercise encouragement, including very recent work using ‘in-the-wild’ interactive machine learning to have a human fitness instructor ‘train’ a robot exercise coach. Given that ethics is all too often seen by engineers as a ‘check-box’ or ‘add-on’ exercise, I also hope to convince you that properly addressing the ethical risk inherent to socially persuasive robotics is not only possible, but actually results in better robots and has made me a better engineer.

Dr. Winkle completed her PhD at the Bristol Robotics Laboratory in the U.K in 2020. Currently, she is a Digital Futures Postdoctoral Research Fellow at The Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, where she is based in the Division of Robotics, Perception and Learning. She is interested in using social robots to positively influence human behavior in the ‘real world’ – this could be anything from robots that motivate you to do your exercises to robots that reduce bullying in schools. Clearly, these situations are very human-centered and socially complex, so she works on design and automation methodologies that look to leverage and utilize human domain expertise.

Fall 2019

lecture: “THE NORM OF PROPORTIONALITY IN EXPRESSED MORAL CRITICISM​

Speaker: Dr. Boyoung Kim (US Air Force Academy)
November 19, 2019

Verbally expressed criticism of moral transgressions is an important tool people use to regulate each other’s behavior, but there has been little research on the social norms that govern such criticism. We examined whether a principle of proportionality regulates expressed moral criticism. The proportionality principle predicts that people should uphold a norm against over blaming and a norm against underblaming. Across 4 studies, people’s judgments revealed a strong norm against overblaming but only a weak norm against under blaming.

Boyoung Kim is a 1st-year post-doctoral researcher at the U.S. Air Force Academy’s Warfighter Effectiveness Research Center. She received her Ph.D. in Psychology from Brown University and Master’s degree in Experimental Psychology from Korea University. Her research interests lie in the field of social cognition, particularly, in social norms, moral judgments and decision-making, and human-robot interaction.

Dr. Kim is currently (2021) a post-doctoral research fellow at George Mason University

Stay Tuned … Video will be available soon.

luncheon Talk: “FAMILY LOVE AND ITS EXTENSION: A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION​

Speaker: Dr. Yanming An (Clemson University)
October 17, 2019

lecture: “THE IDEA OF CYCLICALITY IN THE CHINESE THOUGHT​

Speaker: Dr. Yanming An (Clemson University)
October 17, 2019

Lecture I: Family Love and Its Extension: A Comparative Evaluation

This lecture examines the relationship of family love and universal caring through comparative studies of three ideas of love, namely Christian “universal love,” Confucian “graded love,” and Adam Smith’s “effectual love.” It argues that both Christianity and Confucianism ground their love on family life— sacred or secular, holy or mundane, and both envision a universal scope to include all humans in the world. This ground is natural since its acquisition needs no formal education; it is fundamental since the family is the most basic human institution; it is universal since all humans have their own family; and it is convincing since all humans learn the affection of love from family life first. This familial ground is the main explanation for the fact that Christian love and Confucian love both have won the hearts of a great number of people from various ethnic groups and stood as central traditions respectively in the West and in the world of greater Chinese culture over the past two thousand years.

Lecture II: The Idea of Cyclicality in the Chinese Thought

In the Qin-Han period (3rd century BCE to 3rd Century CE), Heaven was interpreted primarily by Dong Zhongshu as anthropomorphic deity, and by Sima Qian as celestial system. Its alterations might affect human affairs directly, causing a long-term social process: the “cultural cycle” of “faithfulness,” “respectfulness” and “refinement.” Since 6th century, Chinese thinkers shifted their understanding, reading Heaven mainly as short-term cyclical changes in Nature, such as those of annual seasons, and those in biological organism. In parallel, there was a shift from the doctrine of long-term cultural cycle to that of short-term dynastic cycle. Compared with its counterparts in other civilizations, the Chinese cyclicality consists of four traits. First, it doesn’t contain the cosmological conceptions, such as the “Great Year” in the Greek. Here the evolution in both Heaven and humans appears as a continuous extension of “chain” with no periodical interruption. Second, this chain is composed of individual links. The “cyclicality” characterizes the formation of all links; it is not the chain itself, but each of links that is cyclically shaped. Third, the Chinese are particularly interested in the “individuality of links,” emphasizing the specialty of each link and the difference among all links. Fourth, this idea possesses an optimistic spirit. It insists that any societal alteration results ultimately from human behaviors, rather than Heavenly decree, fate, etc. People enjoy freedom to make their choice and, at the same time, must take responsibility for their decision.

Dr. An received his Ph.D. in Asian Languages and Cultures from the University of Michigan in 1997. Before coming to the U.S. in 1991, he served as associate director of a research section at Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. He joined the faculty of Clemson University in 1999, after two years teaching at the University of Michigan and Princeton University. He has taught courses on Ancient and Modern Chinese Philosophy, Pre-modern Chinese literature, Chinese Buddhism, Comparative Philosophy, and Chinese language at all levels, modern and classic.

 

 

Meet the Author: “THE SYNTHETIC AGE: OUTDESIGNING EVOLUTION, RESURRECTING SPECIES, AND REENGINEERING OUR WORLD​

Speaker: Dr. Christopher Preston (University of Montana)
September 19, 2019

Many people are talking today talking about the Anthropocene, the age of humans. The Anthropocene may, however, be only a stepping stone on the way towards a more dramatic “synthetic age.” This talk will explain the differences between the Anthropocene and the Synthetic Age. In this new book, Dr. Preston writes on the ethics of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology, synthetic biology, and geoengineering. He describes a range of technologies that will reconfigure Earth’s very metabolism: nanotechnologies that can restructure natural forms of matter. He looks at “molecular manufacturing” that offers unlimited repurposing, as well as the relocation and resurrection of species and climate engineering attempts to manager solar radiation by synthesizing a volcanic haze.

Christopher J. Preston is the author of The Synthetic Age: Outdesigning Evolution, Resurrecting Species, and Reengineering Our World (MIT Press, 2018); editor of Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene (Rowman and Littlefield, 2016); editor and contributor to Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management (Lexington, 2012). He wrote Saving Creation: Nature and Faith in the Life of Holmes Rolston, III (Trinity University Press, 2009) and Grounding Knowledge: Environmental Philosophy, Epistemology, and Place (University of Georgia Press, 2003). He has published more than thirty articles in environmental philosophy and related areas. His philosophical interests include wilderness and re-wilding, ecofeminism, the Anthropocene, climate engineering, the science/ethics interface, and environmental epistemology. He holds a Masters degree in applied ethics from Colorado State University in Fort Collins, and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Oregon in Eugene. He is a research fellow at the university’s Program on Ethics and Public Affairs.

 

Lecture: “GENDER AND CLIMATE ENGINEERING

Speaker: Dr. Christopher Preston (University of Montana)
September 17, 2019

Lecture: “ETHICS OF TECHNOLOGY ANd SOCIETY

Speaker: Dr. Christopher Preston (University of Montana)
September 16, 2019

Spring 2019

Earth Day Talk: “The ETHICS OF Solar Geoengineering

Speaker: Dr. Marion Hourdequin (Colorado College)
April 22, 2019

Global climate change poses a serious challenge to the stability and flourishing of human beings and ecological systems worldwide. Under the UNFCCC, countries around the world have spent decades negotiating responses to climate change, and there is a broad consensus that substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and significant adaptation are needed to avoid increasingly severe climate impacts. This will require significant social transformation and decarbonization of the global economy. However, the pace of change has been slow, and some scientists have begun to explore strategies to counteract warming by reflecting a small proportion of incoming solar radiation back into space – not as a substitute, but as a supplement to mitigation and adaptation. Research on these solar radiation management (SRM) techniques is in its early stages, and there is disagreement about whether and how research and development of SRM should proceed. Despite these disagreements, it is widely recognized that solar geoengineering is not merely a technical issue: it raises complex questions of ethics and governance. This talk will provide a brief overview of possible technical approaches to solar geoengineering, then discuss in depth some of the ethical and governance questions raised by efforts to research and develop strategies to intentionally manipulate the climate at the global scale.

Dr. Marion Hourdequin is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Philosophy Department at Colorado College, specializing in environmental philosophy. Her research and teaching interests also include ethics, comparative philosophy, animal studies, and philosophy of science. Dr. Hourdequin’s current research focuses on climate ethics, climate justice, and the social and ethical dimensions of ecological restoration. She is the author of Environmental Ethics: From Theory to Practice (Bloomsbury, 2015) and editor, with David Havlick, of Restoring Layered Landscapes (Oxford, 2015). She serves as an Associate Editor for the journal Environmental Values, and is on the editorial board of Environmental Ethics.

 

Luncheon Talk: “MAGICAL UNREALISM: LITERARY FORM AND SOFTWARE MEET IN BIOSHOCK INFINITE

Speaker: Dr. James Malazita (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
April 9, 2019

Does software have literary form? Can game development software shape the kinds of stories we can even tell? In this talk, Dr. James Malazita discusses tensions that occur when narrative form meets computational system. Focusing on the BioShock Infinite character, Elizabeth, the talk will show how Magical Realism is interpreted and interpretable via the Unreal Engine.

Dr. Jim Malazita is holds a joint appoint in the Games & Simulation Arts & Sciences (GSAS) Program and in the Department of Science & Technology Studies (STS) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is the PI on a National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH)-funded educational initiative, alt.code, that uses arts and the digital humanities to bridge critical social theory with computer science education. Dr. Malazita founded and directs RPI’s Tactical Humanities Lab, a critical digital humanities research and pedagogical space. As a hybrid space for technical production and humanistic inquiry, work in the THL centers around two intersecting initiatives: Critical Platform Studies, or the analysis of political, epistemic, and structural power built into technical systems, and Critical Platform Design, or the construction of digital and material technosystems that promote alternative and subversive ways of thinking about technology and society.

 

Luncheon Talk: “INCLUSION AND ETHICS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION

Speaker: Dr. James Malazita (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute)
April 8, 2019

Should questions about ethics, identity and diversity be included in Computer Science courses? If so, what is the best way to include them? In this talk, Dr. James Malazita discusses the challenges in infusing ethics into technical education and tactics he has used to bridge this gap. In addition, he surveys the ways that these tactics can help diversity initiatives on campus.

Dr. Jim Malazita is holds a joint appoint in the Games & Simulation Arts & Sciences (GSAS) Program and in the Department of Science & Technology Studies (STS) at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He is the PI on a National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH)-funded educational initiative, alt.code, that uses arts and the digital humanities to bridge critical social theory with computer science education. Dr. Malazita founded and directs RPI’s Tactical Humanities Lab, a critical digital humanities research and pedagogical space. As a hybrid space for technical production and humanistic inquiry, work in the THL centers around two intersecting initiatives: Critical Platform Studies, or the analysis of political, epistemic, and structural power built into technical systems, and Critical Platform Design, or the construction of digital and material technosystems that promote alternative and subversive ways of thinking about technology and society.

 

Luncheon Talk: “SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN – CLIMATE, CULTURE, AND CONSEQUENCES IN ACADEMIC SCIENCES, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINE

Speaker: Dr. Frazier Benya (National Academies)
March 18, 2019

The consensus study report Sexual Harassment of Women explores the influence of sexual harassment in academia on the career advancement of women in the scientific, technical, and medical workforce. This report reviews the research on the extent to which women in the fields of science, engineering, and medicine are victimized by sexual harassment and examines the existing information on the extent to which sexual harassment in academia negatively impacts the recruitment, retention, and advancement of women pursuing scientific, engineering, technical, and medical careers. It also identifies and analyzes the policies, strategies and practices that have been the most successful in preventing and addressing sexual harassment in these settings.

Dr. Frazier Benya is a Senior Program Officer with the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM) at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Dr. Benya’s work focuses on ensuring that science, engineering, and medicine are ethical and socially responsible, both in their practice and in who gets to participate in the work. She recently served as the study director for the National Academies consensus study report Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Dr. Benya holds a Ph.D. in History of Science, Technology, and Medicine from the University of Minnesota. Dr. Benya was elected a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences in 2017.

 

Panel Discussion: “THE INTEGRATION OF HUMANITIES & ARTS IN STEM (M)

Panelists:
Dr. Frazier Benya (National Academies)
Dr. Laurie Baefsky (University of Colorado Denver)
Irene Ngun (National Academies)
Dr. Dean Nieusma (Colorado School of Mines)
Dr. Sarah Hitt (Colorado School of Mines)

March 18, 2019

Experts from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine; CU-Denver’s College of Arts & Media; and Mines faculty will discuss the role of the humanities and arts in STEM education. Please join us to hear about cutting-edge research and explore opportunities to rethink the engineering curriculum at Mines.

Dr. Frazier Benya is a Senior Program Officer with the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM) at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Dr. Benya’s work focuses on ensuring that science, engineering, and medicine are ethical and socially responsible, both in their practice and in who gets to participate in the work. She recently served as the study director for the National Academies consensus study report Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Dr. Benya holds a Ph.D. in History of Science, Technology, and Medicine from the University of Minnesota. Dr. Benya was elected a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences in 2017.


 

Dr. Laurie Baefsky is the Associate Dean for Research, Collaboration and Innovation in the College of Arts & Media at the University of Colorado Denver. As the first college in Colorado devoted exclusively to arts and entertainment, the College of Arts & Media is one of the few public institutions nationally, with program and curricula that includes 3D and Digital Animation, Digital Design, Music Business, Singer/Song Writing, Recording Arts, Film & TV and other areas that are central to the creative industries.. She has developed and led arts integrated educational initiatives for over 15 years. As executive director of ArtsEngine and the Alliance for the Arts in Research Universities (a2ru) housed at the University of Michigan, she works locally and nationally to support and strengthen arts and transdisciplinary arts endeavors in higher education. She is currently PI on a three-year Mellon Foundation-supported research initiative, SPARC — Supporting Practice in the Arts, Research and Curricula.

*Dr. Baefsky is currently (2021) the Dean of the College of Arts and Media and the University of Montana


 

Irene Ngun is an Associate Program Officer with the Board on Higher Education and Workforce (BHEW) at the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. She also serves as Research Associate for the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM), a standing committee of the National Academies. Before joining the National Academies she was a congressional intern for the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology (Democratic Office) and served briefly in the office of Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (D-33).

Irene Ngun received her M.A. from Yonsei Graduate School of International Studies (Seoul,South Korea), where she developed her interest in  science policy. She received her B.A. from Goshen College in Biochemistry/Molecular Biology and Global Economics.


 

Dean Nieusma is Division Director and Associate Professor of Engineering, Design, & Society. He received his Ph.D. in science and technology studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and bachelor’s degrees in mechanical engineering and general studies from the University of Michigan. Prior to graduate school, he worked as a manufacturing engineer at Ford Motor Co. His research focuses on integrating social and technical dimensions of engineering in education and practice, with a focus on design and project-based learning. He is also broadly interested in the social and ethical implications of technologies and the application of engineering and design expertise to enduring social and environmental problems. He has received several awards and fellowships for research, teaching, and service, including a Fulbright fellowship (Sri Lanka) and, most recently, ASEE’s Olmsted Award for contributions to the liberal education of engineers.

 


 

Sarah Jayne Hitt is a Professor of Liberal Studies at the New Model Institute for Technology and Engineering, Herefordshire, UK. She is a passionate and dedicated educator with a talent for developing innovative curricula that integrates engineering and applied sciences with the arts, humanities, social sciences, and policy; experienced administrator with a track record of building successful and sustainable educational programs; unique expertise in engineering ethics, technical communication, and interdisciplinary teaching and scholarship that has been recognized at the national and international level.

Luncheon Talk: “THE INTEGRATION OF THE HUMANITIES AND ARTS WITH SCIENCES, ENGINEERING, AND MEDICINE IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Speakers: Dr. Laurie Baefsky (University of Colorado Denver) and Irene Ngun (National Academies)
March 18, 2019

Dr. Laurie Baefsky is the Associate Dean for Research, Collaboration and Innovation in the College of Arts & Media at the University of Colorado Denver. As the first college in Colorado devoted exclusively to arts and entertainment, the College of Arts & Media is one of the few public institutions nationally, with program and curricula that includes 3D and Digital Animation, Digital Design, Music Business, Singer/Song Writing, Recording Arts, Film & TV and other areas that are central to the creative industries.. She has developed and led arts integrated educational initiatives for over 15 years. As executive director of ArtsEngine and the Alliance for the Arts in Research Universities (a2ru) housed at the University of Michigan, she works locally and nationally to support and strengthen arts and transdisciplinary arts endeavors in higher education. She is currently PI on a three-year Mellon Foundation-supported research initiative, SPARC — Supporting Practice in the Arts, Research and Curricula.

*Dr. Baefsky is currently (2021) the Dean of the College of Arts and Media and the University of Montana

 

Workshop: “THINKING ABOUT IDENTITY IN THE STEM CLASSROOM: SOME CHALLENGES FROM (AND TO) FEMINIST, QUEER AND DISABILITY STUDIES

Speakers: Dr. Amy E. Slaton (Drexel University)
February 12, 2019

For this session, I hope to tap into the generous, inclusive sensibility that many STEM, humanities, ethics and other instructors bring to their teaching and at the same time into the frustrations many of us have had with conventional “diversity” programming. Certainly programming offered at the institutional level can often feel remote from the day-to-day relationships of university classrooms and labs, as it traffics in idealized, even “feel good” visions of tolerance rather than the address of deep, systemic inequities and lived trauma. Scholars in the fields of Feminist, Queer and Disabilities Studies have been among the most careful and constructive critics of such diversity programming. One of their aims has been to signal the essentializing effects of inclusive pedagogy (as it commonly reduces people to easily known and singular identities, as “women” or “disabled people,” say). Another has been to ask hard questions about where discrimination actually resides (asking whether an ideology of welcome in the academy can ever actually subvert structural inequities in STEM). While much of this work is explicitly theoretical, it is nonetheless deeply political, and can bring many transformative practices to our STEM teaching.

Dr. Amy E. Slaton is a professor of history at Drexel University. She holds a PhD in the History and Sociology of Science from the University of Pennsylvania. Her research focuses on the history of technical expertise and work, seen through the lens of historical ideas of human difference. Her most recent book, Race, Rigor and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line (Harvard University Press, 2010), follows racial ideologies in engineering higher education since the 1940s. Her current book project, All Good People: Diversity, Difference and Opportunity in High-Tech America describes the limits of American commitments to equity around race, gender, LGBTQ identities, and disabilities as those are expressed in the training of the nation’s industrial workforce. In 2017 she won the Sterling Olmsted Award, which honors those who have made distinguished contributions to the development and teaching of liberal arts in engineering education. It is the highest award given by the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of the American Society for Engineering Education.

 

Luncheon Talk: “INNOVATION, OPPORTUNITY, AND OTHER FINE PROMISES: WHAT ‘STEM DIVERSITY’ MEANS AND CAN MEAN IN 2019

Speakers: Dr. Amy E. Slaton (Drexel University)
February 11, 2019

As many Silicon Valley leaders, AI entrepreneurs, and other authoritative voices in the tech sector today promise a stronger economy and better lives for Americans through high-tech innovation, a strong message of inclusion and diversity often shares the stage. We are told that wherever STEM talent is to be found, corporate America will find it, thus bringing long-excluded creative women, people of color, disabled people, and people of LGBTQI identities into the inventive fold. It may sound new, but the idea that innovative R&D and inclusion go together is actually generations-old at this point. What has made this promise so compelling, for so long in the United States? And can the 2019 version do any more to correct the nation’s inequities than have those older, and obviously, less than successful, invocations?

Dr. Amy E. Slaton is a professor of history at Drexel University. She holds a PhD in the History and Sociology of Science from the University of Pennsylvania. Her research focuses on the history of technical expertise and work, seen through the lens of historical ideas of human difference. Her most recent book, Race, Rigor and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line (Harvard University Press, 2010), follows racial ideologies in engineering higher education since the 1940s. Her current book project, All Good People: Diversity, Difference and Opportunity in High-Tech America describes the limits of American commitments to equity around race, gender, LGBTQ identities, and disabilities as those are expressed in the training of the nation’s industrial workforce. In 2017 she won the Sterling Olmsted Award, which honors those who have made distinguished contributions to the development and teaching of liberal arts in engineering education. It is the highest award given by the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of the American Society for Engineering Education.

 

fall 2018

Workshop: “DIVERSITY TO INCLUSION TO EQUITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE: CONSIDERING DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ANALYSIS TO RETHINK WHAT ‘BROADENING PARTICIPATION’ MEANS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION

Speakers: Dr. Alice Pawley (Purdue University)
September 11, 2018

In this workshop, I will join others in encouraging engineering education and educators to move beyond language of diversity, and even inclusion in thinking about engineering education’s persistent White and male demographics. I will pose the question – if we had started from the structural realities of the lives of minoritized folks, how might engineering education look different? I will offer a framework and tools for thinking through different levels of analysis in higher education, and work with participants to generate ideas on what consequences those tools might have for the interactions we have, the content that we teach, the policies that govern our classrooms, and the values we build into policies and practices in our colleges and universities. There will be time for reflection, discussion, sharing, and hopefully a little inspiration and commitment.

Dr. Alice Pawley (she, her, hers) is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program, Environmental and Ecological Engineering, and the Purdue Climate Change Research Center at Purdue University. She was co-PI of Purdue’s ADVANCE program from 2008-2014, focusing on the underrepresentation of women in STEM faculty positions. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education Group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at pawleyresearch.org. She was a National Academy of Engineering CASEE Fellow in 2007, received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women, and received the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute in 2013. More recently, she received her school’s Award for Excellence in Mentoring, the Award for Leadership, and a 2019 award from the College of Engineering as an Outstanding Faculty Mentor of Engineering Graduate Students. In 2020 she won the Sterling Olmsted Award from the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of ASEE. She is president of Purdue’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors (2020-22). She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity.

 

Luncheon Talk: “BEYOND ‘DIVERSITY:’ CONSIDERING RULING RELATIONS TO HELP MAKE ENGINEERING EDUCATION MORE SOCIALLY JUSt

Speakers: Dr. Alice Pawley (Purdue University)
September 10, 2018

There seems to be a disconnect between the purported goal of engineering education (and perhaps STEM education broadly) to become a more inclusive discipline, and the means by which this is accomplished. Efforts from thousands of dedicated researchers and program directors around the country continue in full force to develop theory and programming to better recruit, hire or admit, retain, promote, and sustain underrepresented women and men in engineering education; and yet overall the needle budges little.

In this talk, I join with others in problematizing the language of “diversity” in higher education, and offer a different way for thinking about gender and race in engineering education. While the careful investigation of psychological constructs in education have brought great value to the broadening participation in STEM research space, less interrogated are the structural aspects of how gender and race are baked into the very institution of higher education and of engineering education into which we are hoping to recruit, hire or admit, retain, promote, and sustain minoritized women and men. This talk draws on feminist and critical race theory to help us start to “shift the default” of our thinking away from allowing the White male backdrop of higher and engineering education to remain invisible and default, and towards rethinking policies and practices to make it more socially just. Sociologist Dorothy Smith has offered, now as part of her institutional ethnographic method, a theory of ruling relations which pushes us to ask, how do we come to “do” engineering education in a coordinated way in higher education, and how might those social relations operate more in the interests of the institution than in the interests of those people who work within it? I ask here, how do ruling relations function to produce an institution of engineering education in higher education that maintains itself as predominantly White and male without appearing to do so?

I will share introduce some theory on gender, race, and intersectionality, some stories from my “Learning from Small Numbers” project, and some both small and big ideas for how engineering instructors and engineering education researchers can put these ideas into practice.

Dr. Alice Pawley (she, her, hers) is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and an affiliate faculty member in the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program, Environmental and Ecological Engineering, and the Purdue Climate Change Research Center at Purdue University. She was co-PI of Purdue’s ADVANCE program from 2008-2014, focusing on the underrepresentation of women in STEM faculty positions. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Education Group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at pawleyresearch.org. She was a National Academy of Engineering CASEE Fellow in 2007, received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women, and received the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute in 2013. More recently, she received her school’s Award for Excellence in Mentoring, the Award for Leadership, and a 2019 award from the College of Engineering as an Outstanding Faculty Mentor of Engineering Graduate Students. In 2020 she won the Sterling Olmsted Award from the Liberal Education/Engineering and Society Division of ASEE. She is president of Purdue’s chapter of the American Association of University Professors (2020-22). She helped found, fund, and grow the PEER Collaborative, a peer mentoring group of early career and recently tenured faculty and research staff primarily evaluated based on their engineering education research productivity.

 

Summer 2018

daniels fund faculty fellows summer workshop

The 2nd cohort of Daniels Fund Faculty Fellows and a few other Mines faculty attended the three-day Daniels Fund Faculty Workshop. The three-day workshop discussed the Daniels Fund Ethics Initiative Ethics Principles, the history of science and engineering ethics in the global context, approaches to integrating ethics principles into technical courses (e.g., micro insertion), and strategies for assessing ethics education. A detailed agenda for this workshop can be found here. If you are interested in knowing more about this workshop, please contact us

Speakers: 

Michael Davis (Illinois Institute of Technology)
Carl Mitcham (The Renmin University of China, Colorado School of Mines)
Michael Mumford (University of Oklahoma)
Sandy Woodson (Colorado School of Mines)

Dates: July 27-29, 2018
Location: Stratton Hall 104

Spring 2018

Lecture: “THE SYNTHETIC AGE: OUTDESIGNING EVOLUTION, RESURRECTING SPECIES, AND REENGINEERING OUR WORLD

Speakers: Dr. Christopher J. Preston (University of Montana)
April 18, 2018

Many people are talking today talking about the Anthropocene, the age of humans. The Anthropocene may, however, be only a stepping stone on the way towards a more dramatic “synthetic age.” This talk will explain the differences between the Anthropocene and the Synthetic Age. In this new book, Dr. Preston writes on the ethics of emerging technologies such as nanotechnology, synthetic biology, and geoengineering. He describes a range of technologies that will reconfigure Earth’s very metabolism: nanotechnologies that can restructure natural forms of matter. He looks at “molecular manufacturing” that offers unlimited repurposing, as well as the relocation and resurrection of species and climate engineering attempts to manager solar radiation by synthesizing a volcanic haze.

Christopher J. Preston is the author of The Synthetic Age: Outdesigning Evolution, Resurrecting Species, and Reengineering Our World (MIT Press, 2018); editor of Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene (Rowman and Littlefield, 2016); editor and contributor to Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management (Lexington, 2012). He wrote Saving Creation: Nature and Faith in the Life of Holmes Rolston, III (Trinity University Press, 2009) and Grounding Knowledge: Environmental Philosophy, Epistemology, and Place (University of Georgia Press, 2003). He has published more than thirty articles in environmental philosophy and related areas. His philosophical interests include wilderness and re-wilding, ecofeminism, the Anthropocene, climate engineering, the science/ethics interface, and environmental epistemology. He holds a Masters degree in applied ethics from Colorado State University in Fort Collins, and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Oregon in Eugene. He is a research fellow at the university’s Program on Ethics and Public Affairs.

 

Luncheon Talk: “WHEN EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES CONFRONT WILDNESS

Speakers: Dr. Christopher J. Preston (University of Montana)
April 19, 2018

Powerful emerging technologies such as synthetic biology and climate engineering are creating new types of artifacts on increasingly dramatic scales. Artificial genomes and artificial climates would provide humans with unprecedented capacity to transform nature and with deeply unfamiliar management responsibilities. No artifact, however, is immune to wildness. This talk will highlight how wildness can linger in every artifact, both in terms of the artifact’s engineering and in terms of its social/political context. The presence of wildness in these new technological tools makes particular moral demands on those who develop such technologies. The talk will consider some of those moral demands.

Christopher J. Preston is the author of The Synthetic Age: Outdesigning Evolution, Resurrecting Species, and Reengineering Our World (MIT Press, 2018); editor of Climate Justice and Geoengineering: Ethics and Policy in the Atmospheric Anthropocene (Rowman and Littlefield, 2016); editor and contributor to Engineering the Climate: The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management (Lexington, 2012). He wrote Saving Creation: Nature and Faith in the Life of Holmes Rolston, III (Trinity University Press, 2009) and Grounding Knowledge: Environmental Philosophy, Epistemology, and Place (University of Georgia Press, 2003). He has published more than thirty articles in environmental philosophy and related areas. His philosophical interests include wilderness and re-wilding, ecofeminism, the Anthropocene, climate engineering, the science/ethics interface, and environmental epistemology. He holds a Masters degree in applied ethics from Colorado State University in Fort Collins, and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Oregon in Eugene. He is a research fellow at the university’s Program on Ethics and Public Affairs.

 

FALL 2017

Faculty Workshop: “TROUBLE IN THE CAP TRIANGLE: STRATEGIES FOR ASSESSING ENGINEERING LEARNING

Speakers: Dr. Brent K. Jesiek (Purdue University)
October 2, 2017

As a best practice in instructional design, instructors should be concerned with aligning the three vertices of the CAP triangle: content, assessment, and pedagogy. This presentation delves into what this means in practice, including by drawing examples from various kinds of engineering coursework. Special attention is also paid to assessment, including specific strategies that can be used to evaluate student learning of both technical content and professional competencies.

Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.

Lecture: “FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING ETHICS EDUCATION: PERCEPTIONS, INTERVENTIONS, AND INSTRUMENTS

Speakers: Dr. Brent K. Jesiek (Purdue University)
October 3, 2017

Recently proposed changes to the accreditation criteria for engineering degree programs directly underscore the need for graduates who are able to “recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments.” But what precisely does this mean, and what can be done to cultivate and evaluate such capabilities? This presentation begins to address such questions by drawing insights from the extant literature and a number of in-progress research projects. Four more specific considerations are highlighted:

  1. Typical student perceptions of ethics and social responsibility,
  2. Complexities associated with practicing ethically when working globally,
  3. Promising training interventions to cultivate ethical professional conduct, and
  4. Challenges and opportunities for assessing ethics outcomes.

Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.

Lecture: “LESSONS AMID THE RUBBLE: POST-DISASTER ENGINEERING AND ETHICS

Speakers: Dr. Sarah Pfatteicher (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
September 18, 2017

Faculty Roundtable: “SPEAKING UP & LAYING LOW: PROS AND CONS OF TAKING MORAL STANCES IN ACADEMIA

Speakers: Dr. Sarah Pfatteicher (University of Wisconsin-Madison)
September 18, 2017

Dr Pfatteicher is the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs in the College of Agricultural and Life Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she is also Research Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, as well as a member of the Holtz Center for Science and Technology Studies and an elected fellow of the Teaching Academy.  Her research emphasis is in engineering ethics and education, and disaster prevention and response. Both of these topics are covered in her book, Lessons amid the Rubble: An Introduction to Post-Disaster Engineering and Ethics (Hopkins, 2010). Dr. Pfatteicher has served chair of the Executive Board of the Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, and worked as a consultant to the University of Wisconsin Police Department in emergency management. She received the American Society for Engineering Education’s 2009 Olmsted Award for contributions to the liberal arts within engineering, and the Wisconsin Alumni Association’s 2012 Excellence in Leadership Award.  Dr. Pfatteicher earned her bachelor’s degree in physics and mathematics from Smith College and master’s and doctoral degrees in the history of science from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

* Currently (2021) Dr. Pfatteicher is Executive Director of the Five College Consortium, a nonprofit educational corporation established in 1965 to promote the broad educational and cultural objectives of its associated institutions: Amherst, Hampshire, Mount Holyoke and Smith Colleges and the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Spring 2017

Faculty Workshop: “HOW TO SUCCEED IN TEACHING ETHICS WITHOUT REALLY TRYING

Speakers: Dr. Michael C. Loui (Purdue University)
April 5, 2017

This faculty workshop will provide an overview of resources and methods for teaching ethics in engineering and science. Participants will employ Dr. Loui’s methods for discussing ethics cases and assessing students’ learning. Participants should bring a laptop or tablet computer with a keyboard for short writing exercises and Internet access.

Dr. Michael C. Loui holds the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professorship in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He was previously Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and University Distinguished Teacher-Scholar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He has conducted research in computational complexity theory, in professional ethics, and in engineering education. He is a Carnegie Scholar, a Fellow of the IEEE, and a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. Professor Loui was the editor of the Journal of Engineering Education from 2012 to 2017 and the executive editor of College Teaching from 2006 to 2012. He was Associate Dean of the Graduate College at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1980 and the B.S. at Yale University in 1975.

*Dr. Loui is now (2021) a Professor Emeritus at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

 

Special Session: “WHY DID YOUR JOURNAL REJECT MY PAPER? A CONVERSATION WITH THE EDITOR OF THE JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION

Speakers: Dr. Michael C. Loui (Purdue University)
April 5, 2017

Lecture: “ENGINEERING ETHICS AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION

Speakers: Dr. Michael C. Loui (Purdue University)
April 4, 2017

In engineering, concerns about ethics have evolved since the early 1900s. At its core, engineering ethics has focused on the professional responsibilities of individual engineers. Like other accredited programs that lead to professional degrees, all engineering programs have incorporated some instruction in ethics, though practices vary greatly among institutions. In this talk, I will describe a selection of key events in the history of engineering ethics in the United States, contemporary practices in the teaching of engineering ethics, and recent research on engineering ethics education.

Dr. Michael C. Loui holds the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professorship in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He was previously Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and University Distinguished Teacher-Scholar at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He has conducted research in computational complexity theory, in professional ethics, and in engineering education. He is a Carnegie Scholar, a Fellow of the IEEE, and a Fellow of the American Society for Engineering Education. Professor Loui was the editor of the Journal of Engineering Education from 2012 to 2017 and the executive editor of College Teaching from 2006 to 2012. He was Associate Dean of the Graduate College at Illinois from 1996 to 2000. He directed the theory of computing program at the National Science Foundation from 1990 to 1991. He earned the Ph.D. at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1980 and the B.S. at Yale University in 1975.

*Dr. Loui is now (2021) a Professor Emeritus at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.